tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294499213897153104.post5552635255089231861..comments2024-03-27T09:00:32.195-05:00Comments on The Signal Watch: Amazing Watch: Sorceress (1982)The Leaguehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04836241071795980225noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294499213897153104.post-4639670158103344312020-04-01T17:23:21.002-05:002020-04-01T17:23:21.002-05:00They *really* went to town on the boob-factor. An...They *really* went to town on the boob-factor. And I mean, at the earliest opportunity in the movie.<br /><br />I would be curious to read what the writer was up to, if anything. The rest I can piece together through the power of Roger Corman. Except for the satyr. No idea why they committed to that idea.The Leaguehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04836241071795980225noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294499213897153104.post-3516009957518452752020-04-01T15:55:11.064-05:002020-04-01T15:55:11.064-05:00It's been a few years since I've seen this...It's been a few years since I've seen this particular piece of cinema. The best I can describe it is "awkward". Nothing really works in it. I felt like they had a junk drawer of stuff and ideas that they threw together.<br /><br />The excess of boobs goes beyond what was expected at the time. The satyr makes me uncomfortable whenever he's on the screen. The Viking I guess was supposed to be dwarf but they didn't know what those were. The main guy isn't likeable, let alone a lovable rogue. Even the cover looks like they couldn't be bothered (they pulled from the first line of Conan the Barbarian - "Between the time when the oceans drank Atlantis, and the rise of the sons of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of.").Groboclownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00516458842732596083noreply@blogger.com