Watched: 07/24/2024
Format: Alamo
Viewing: First
Director: John Carpenter
I'd not previously seen Starman (1984). When I was a kid, I think my folks decided it would have hanky-panky in it when it started and we didn't make it past literally the first scene. There was a briefly lived TV show based on the movie starring Robert Hays of Airplane! fame, and I caught that a few times.
When I was renting movies on my own, I just tagged it as "romance E.T." and took a pass.
Anyway, here in 2024, Simon suggested we pay tribute to John Carpenter, who wrote and directed the film, so - with Jamie included, we took in a screening.
I don't take it as a knock that Starman is pretty much exactly what I expected out of the premise as I understood it from 40 years of occasionally stumbling across discussion of the movie, but if you watched 1980's media, it's pretty much what you'd expecting, and that's "romance E.T."
So if that's true, we have to ponder the execution - and that's where I think the movie does okay.
Karen Allen plays a Wisconsinite who has been recently widowed when her husband died suddenly in an accident. Aliens from a distant planet have intercepted Voyager 2, and taken the messages of welcome at their word, sending a craft to Earth.
The ship crashes near Karen Allen's home, and an alien enters, taking on the form of her deceased husband. The alien forces Allen into taking him to Arizona, where he is set to rendezvous with his people in a few days.
Along the way, she sees he's benevolent and an okay alien. But they're pursued by a military detail supported by Charles Martin Smith.
As I say, all of this is pretty boilerplate stuff. So what's asked of the film is that the actors - who mostly are just two people acting together in cars, motels, diners, etc... sell the relationship which starts at uncanny terror and evolves into romance in a short time. The vibe is a sort of romantic poem wherein an outsider sees us for what we are, and falls for an Earth woman and an Earth woman has reason to fall for an awkward alien wearing her dead husband's face.
And, for the most part, I think the movie works because of those performances. Jeff Bridges earned an academy award nod for the part, to which he brings a charm and warmth instead of a hammy performance that would have turned this into slapstick or schlock. Karen Allen gets the most screentime and dialog of any picture in which I've seen her, and she's really, really good. There's so many things to play, both as an avatar for the audience dealing with an actual alien, and as a character who is still dealing with grief and trauma who now has this experience, and I can't think of how you improve on what she did.
The movie kind of works on those performances, vibes and the occasional bit of wonder in acts performed by the alien.
Anyway, yeah. Like I say, in 2024 and having seen many movies, I don't know that the plot held many surprises, but as a movie it still works. And would be a swell date movie some time.
By the way spoiler here - but the alien doesn't just magically become Jeff Bridges as a full adult. There's a pretty remarkable FX sequence that was made by a combo of work by Dick Smith, Rick Baker and Stan Winston - all on one brief sequence. But it also is the only time I've seen a movie - where there's a clone or copy of someone - start as a baby, which, to me, is the logical thing to happen. I'll accept it doesn't usually, but was impressed that's what they did.
