I saw both of the Chevy Chase Fletch films in the theater, and was part of a generation of people who wanted desperately to be able to quip somewhere between Fletch and Peter Venkman from Ghostbusters, making for a bunch of horrible kids who said the worst thing at the worst time all the time.
But those Chevy Chase movies were both pretty solid, even if the first is definitely better than the second. That said, I also remember my seventh grade Language Arts teacher informing us that the movies weren't a patch on the novels, and that Fletch was fundamentally different in the movies than what a coked-up Chevy Chase was delivering. This did not convince me to check out the books because I was a fan of the movies and felt comfortable in my ignorance. I have not lifted one of the 11 novels.
In the intervening years, I have no idea if anyone else attempted to make a Fletch movie. Just wasn't on my radar. And then in late 2022, I recall ads for a John Hamm movie that was, in fact a new Fletch installment.
Hamm made his bones as Don Draper on Mad Men, but in subsequent years has shown great talent as a comedic actor as well as dramatic. He's puzzlingly not quite caught on as a leading man in giant movies, but he has found a happy home in mid-budget films that wind up on streaming fairly quickly. That said, his brand of comedy has rarely felt much like the persona Chase had made famous, so when I saw he was taking on Fletch, I had no idea how this would go.
The movie itself completely flopped at the box office. I have no idea what the plan was, but the domestic gross was about $540,000. It wasn't a critical darling, but did have a decent RT and Metacritic score. Still, it's telling that this just isn't the sort of thing people will leave the house to go see in 2023.
The first two Fletch films manage to have intensely convoluted plots, but it doesn't matter, because the plots are there as a vehicle for Chase to do his thing, and if he resolves the mystery, that's terrific. He wears disguises and is constantly in motion, and that's enough. This film has a similar and deeply convoluted plot, but Hamm's Fletch doesn't wear disguises, he barely puts on an act when he needs to and he adopts a name (if he can remember it), and I assume it's closer to the books. But you do start to look at the seams of the mystery a lot more, and I'm not sure I entirely get why the murder occurs that Fletch was supposed to confess to that sets up the movie, or why the cops think Fletch knows the victim or would want to kill her (motive, means, etc...). It's entirely random and circumstantial to outside eyes.
But the movie moves along at a good clip, Hamm is actually very funny and stays not quite a step ahead of everyone else unlike Chase's Fletch you thought was 5 steps ahead.
The movie is helped along by a solid cast, including Kyle MacLachlan as an art broker, Marcia Gay Harden playing an Italian Contessa to the hilt, Roy Wood Jr. as a detective/ new father, Ayden Mayeri as Wood Jr's partner, and Annie Mumolo as a wacky neighbor. And John Slattery briefly as Fletch's old boss, now in Boston.
It's kind of an ideal end-of-the-week movie that's not too much of anything, but also not... dumb.
Mostly, I kind of think this should have been just a movie straight to Apple+ or Paramount (where I watched it), and it's fine. It's the sort of thing we all paid to see a lot of in the 1990's. But the fact the movie didn't make any money is probably much more of an indicator now of what people will just wait for than genuine disinterest in the movie. I, for one, blocked time on my calendar to watch it when I saw it was on Paramount.
Would I watch more installments on Hamm as Fletch? I think I would. He's enjoyable, the movie is light and fun, and his version of Fletch's persona in the face of chaos is actually pretty enjoyable. But it's far less broad. That's left to pretty much all the supporting characters. So seeing them do this Knives Out style every two years or so would be welcome. But, I suspect, that ain't happening.
