Saturday, November 14, 2026

Future-Noir-vember Watch: Blade Runner (1982)



Watched:  11/13/2026
Format:  4K disc
Viewing:  Unknown
Director:  Ridley Scott


Like many people around my age, Blade Runner (1982) is a seminal film for me.  I didn't see it until middle school (I was quite young in 1982), and can tell you the impact it had on me even on the family Zenith via VHS.  So rewatching it now on a smart TV in 4K was a curiously illuminating experience.

While this is a top-level movie for me, I hadn't watched it in five years.   I wrote about the movie lovingly a bit over a decade ago.  And, then, we covered it as a podcast five years back.  You'll note it was part of the Signal Watch Canon series, and I claimed it as part of my personal canon.  And it is.  I suspect it was my entree to the notion of noir more than any other film.

Blade Runner is about a detective, sort of, but a man in over his head who gets in worse because of woman who dresses like Joan Crawford in Mildred Pierce.  A sickly/ elderly big boss pulling the strings who is the father to a beautiful daughter the detective falls for?  And people here simply hate overhead lighting, opting for light to pour through venetian blinds.

And, as this is The Final Cut, a deeply ambiguous ending that sure feels doomed.  

This may sound odd, but this was the first viewing I think I had in a decade or two where I saw new things because I wasn't thinking about what's in books, documentaries, online, etc... about the movie.  And some of it is quite obvious when you get out of your own way. Duality and Christ imagery with Roy Batty?  Check.  Rachael having an entire unspoken conversation with herself in Deckard's apartment?  Check.  And in 4K, the lights in the eyes of the Replicants is not just there, it's telling the story of the Replicants within the story.

It also was the first time it hit me that this is, in its way, a movie about a slave hunter.  I always knew the job of a Blade Runner was in an ethical and moral gray space, but now?  I have opinions.  And I always knew Deckard did - thus the drinking.

In The Final Cut, there's really no ambiguity about whether Deckard is a replicant or not.  He clearly is, and in his heart, he probably knows this.  

I *will* mention on detail someone pointed out online a while ago, which is that Rick has all his pictures on the piano (a tell, he's collecting memories just like Leon), but among those pictures he has a childhood photo on the same porch as Rachael - but you can only see it in passing.

And if he knows he's a replicant, hoo-boy.  

And what does it mean if Roy is the Savior who killed his Father and spared another Replicant?


it's not too late to make Mildred Pierce chic a thing



Rachael is still a fascinating character, 85% of what's happening with her an internal battle.  What is she if she is not who she thought she was?  The self-assured woman of the first act falling apart as she turns to Deckard.  But there's a moment in that apartment where she's capable of *anything* as she sees Rick, vulnerable and bleeding after she's saved his life.  His job is to kill her, after all.  But you can see the pragmatism of the replicant fade in her eyes and the warmth of human light return as she makes her choice.  

And at the end of the day, it's a movie about choosing our humanity and fighting against the wills of our fathers and gods who would set us upon each other.  

Anyway, if you haven't seen the movie yet in 4K, do so.  Not every movie feels like it's speaking more clearly with the digital upgrade, but I can't say I'm surprised to say I think Blade Runner does so.  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep it friendly. Comment moderation is now on (which means your comment will not automagically appear). Your comment will be reviewed and published if it is reasonable. if it is not published, please do some self-reflection.